Eating the Crisis??? - HPoA

HPoA is the most unserious and immature committee yet. Crisis introduced? Just eat it.

Their recent crisis about the Emu war perfectly shows this mindset. No wonder they lost to the Emu’s, one of their great ideas to help with the crisis was “can we eat these Emus” the world was yet to see the levels of incompetency as shown by Ted Theodore. He introduced his master plan for their crisis, the Emu’s.

It appears that the minute one enters HPoA all thoughts of formality and following actual decorum exit their body. Stanley Bruce is the epitome of informality, not only were they punished for being extremely informal throughout the committee they also proceeded to question the chairs’ decision saying “do I have to??” This shows how little they respect their chairs and have no respect for MUN decorum.

This committee as a whole has shown minimal effort in addressing their ongoing crisis, displaying a lack of urgency and initiative to ask even the most basic questions necessary for resolution. Rather than engaging constructively, the delegates have instead prioritized undermining the decorum of the committee, consistently disregarding the gravity of the situation at hand.

A majority of the delegates have failed to contribute meaningfully, with most Points of Inquiry (POIs) being met with the habitual excuse of responding “in note form”—a note which, notably, was never actually circulated. This further exemplifies the overall incompetence and disengagement that has plagued this committee from the outset. 

Hugh Jass

CNN