FUSS, Futile & Unproductive Squabbles over Semantics

FUSS was kick-started by a crisis directive, preceded in the committee session only by an impressive round of cross-talk. Are there changes in the code of conduct I haven’t taken note of, or did the conversations of these senators transcend simple rules?

The crisis directive suggested gaining public trust back by sending humanitarian care to vulnerable regions, to show that they “care”. Not even a minute later, this suggestion was succeeded by a plan to use military force to eradicate protests. The directive once again contradicted itself when a senator answered, “We could care less about what they think”, to a POI concerned about censorship.

As a surprise in itself that anything could exceed the absurdity of this directive, the committee seemed to waste most of its time fighting over POIs that lack any sort of real substance. Kai Moorthy’s GSL suggested collaborating with international bodies and engaging in international treaties, stating that the belief that the USA can fight this alone is arrogant. However, these points seemed to have missed Yuno Miles, who derailed the committee with an argument about semantics with his POI. After a back-and-forth arguing whether the public coming into committee session with guns is useless, or if the committee is useless, Yuno Miles was forced to sit down.

Before having a confusion with another senator about his own GSL speech about whether he said “mistrust” or “interest”. 

This delegate hopes that FUSS moves past multiple speeches about the committee going nowhere, and actually directs it somewhere.

Fandin Noora

Xinhua News